VUG and QQQM are two of the most popular ETFs in the market. Given their popularity, many people compare VUG vs QQQM and/or ask which fund is a better investment.
My answer to these types of questions is that VUG and QQQM are very different and not necessarily comparable. So rather than write a long post about similarities and differences between VUG and QQQM, I’ll provide a framework for thinking about VUG vs QQQM.
My goal here at ThoughtfulFinance.com is to educate investors and that sometimes includes not answering the exact question that was asked, reframing questions, or providing a different type of answer. As always though, a quick reminder that this site does NOT provide investment recommendations. Fund comparisons (such as this one) are not conducted to identify the “best” fund (since that will vary from investor to investor based on investor-specific factors).
The Short Answer
On the surface, VUG and QQQM look similar as they’re both large-cap growth-oriented funds. They have very different exposures, although that has not led to meaningful differences in volatility. That being said, QQQM has outperformed by a wide margin since inception. Yet, I would not use either fund as a core position, but they could be used as satellite positions.
Types of Investors
There are a few reasons that someone might want to know whether VUG or QQQM is a better investment and I think it has a lot to do with who they are. Different types of investors have varying levels of knowledge, differing goals, and so on.
Even though VUG and QQQM are not necessarily comparable, individual investors may not necessarily understand that the funds are different or what differences really matter. New investors may want to just skip to the bottom of this post.
Some investors may understand that VUG and QQQM are quite different, but may be interested in selecting the one that they believe will perform the best. My response to these investors is that portfolio construction should be based on a target asset allocation (based on risk tolerance, time horizon, liquidity needs, and so on). Once an allocation is selected, then investors can select the best vehicle for each slice of the portfolio allocation. If an investor decides on an asset allocation before selecting investments (as they should!), then the question of VUG vs QQQM will never come up since they fill different roles in a portfolio.
There are some people who think that they can trade in and out of VUG, QQQM, and other investments profitably. To those people, I’d say the research, evidence, and odds are stacked against you but good luck!
VUG vs QQQM: Holdings & Exposures
VUG and QQQM are not comparable because their underlying holdings are so different. An investor’s preference for VUG or QQQM will depend on its role in the portfolio.
Both funds primarily hold stocks, but the composition and exposures of their holdings is very different. Although both VUG and QQQM are large-cap growth funds, QQQM is more concentrated in terms of number of companies and sectors. However, this concentration has not necessarily hurt QQQM relative to VUG. QQQM has underperformed VUG in some periods, but not always. VUG has underperformed QQQM since inception.
All of that being said, QQQM and VUG are more volatile than a broad-based index fund such as VTI or IVV. I would never recommend VUG or QQQM as a core portfolio holding. At best, they could be satellite or complementary positions.
VUG vs QQQM: Performance, Expenses, & Risk
I could compare VUG and QQQM’s historical performance, expense ratios, tax-efficiency, and so on as many sites do. However, these details are only important points of comparison if the funds are comparable, so this post doesn’t include a bunch of meaningless data. Those who are still interested can check out ETF.com’s comparison tool.
Since VUG and QQQM have very different holdings and exposures, comparing historical performance is meaningless. One fund will outperform over certain time periods and the other will outperform over other time periods. I am not going to delve into a performance comparison and attribution, since we already know that the funds are very different. Readers who really want this information can check out tools like Morningstar.com.
Again, any performance difference caused by the expense ratios of VUG and QQQM will be dwarfed by larger differences like holdings, exposures, risk factors, etc. Expenses are very important when all else is equal, but VUG and QQQM are not equal at all!
Risk & Volatility
The two funds are very different, but the risk and volatility has not been that different historically.
Both VUG and QQQM are exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which do have some advantages for investors.
ETFs are typically more tax-efficient than mutual funds, due to their ability to avoid realizing capital gains through like-kind redemptions (a process that is beyond the scope of this post). Thus, these funds are about as tax-efficient as any fund can be and either fund is appropriate in taxable accounts.
ETFs are free to trade on many platforms and investors should have no problem trading VUG or QQQM, which are large and liquid.
Investors limited to mutual funds should have no problem finding a mutual fund version of VUG or a mutual fund version of QQQM.
Investors planning to allocate more than $250,000 may consider direct indexing rather than an ETF or mutual fund, especially if they are in a high tax bracket. Any institutional direct indexer should be able to replicate VUG or QQQM easily.
What Would I Do: VUG or QQQM?
In my opinion, neither VUG nor QQQM is appropriate as a core holding for most portfolios. However, I think either QQQM or VUG could potentially be a satellite holding for some investors. For a core holding, I’d use something like VTI (see how VTI compares to VTI here).