The Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) and the Blackrock/iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (IVV) are two of the largest index mutual funds in existence and easily two of the most popular among individual investors. Both SWPPX and IVV track the well-known S&P 500 index and form the core of many investor portfolios. Many investors compare SWPPX vs IVV in order to decide which should be the foundation of their portfolio.
The Short Answer
The main difference is that SWPPX is a mutual fund and IVV is an ETF; however investors should consider several other factors when deciding which is best.
A quick reminder that this site does NOT provide investment recommendations. Fund comparisons (such as this one) are not conducted to identify the “best” fund (since that will vary from investor to investor based on investor-specific factors). Rather, these fund comparison posts are designed to identify and distinguish between the fund details that matter versus the ones that don’t.
The Long Answer
Historical Performance: SWPPX vs IVV
SWPPX was launched back in 1997, while IVV was launched in May 2000. Since then the two funds have performed identically, with a difference of just .01% annually! The cumulative performance difference between these two funds has been just over .4% (over a 23 year timeframe)! Thus, from a performance perspective, I would consider these two funds interchangeable.
Differences between SWPPX vs IVV
Both SWPPX and IVV track the S&P 500, so I will not delve into differences in geographic exposures, sector weights, or market cap coverage. For all intents and purposes, the portfolios are identical with 504 stocks each. The S&P 500 has more than 500 stocks because of the index constituents have multiple share classes of stock (such as GOOG and GOOGL).
Factors to Consider
ETFs are free to trade at many brokers and custodians, including Schwab. However, many brokers and custodians still charge commissions and/or transaction fees to buy/sell mutual funds. To my knowledge, Schwab does not participate in the pay-to-play arrangements (with their competitor custodians) that would allow their mutual funds to trade for free on many platforms. So if an investor account is at Schwab, it is generally free to trade SWPPX or IVV. However, only IVV is free to trade in many non-Schwab accounts.
There is a bid-ask spread when trading ETFs, but this spread is typically less than .01% for IVV and individual investor trades will not generally be large enough to “move” the market. In the case of IVV, individual investors should not have a problem trading.
Tax Efficiency & Capital Gain Distributions
ETFs are typically more tax-efficient than mutual funds, due to their ability to avoid realizing capital gains through like-kind redemptions (a process that is beyond the scope of this post). As expected, IVV is more tax-efficient.
SWPPX has made capital gains distributions in the past and I would expect this to continue in future. IVV has never paid out a capital gain distribution, nor do I expect it to in the future. Thus, tax-sensitive investors may want to consider whether ETFs make more sense for them.
Tax Loss Harvesting
My personal preference is to keep a portfolio entirely mutual funds or entirely ETFs, due to the mechanics of settlement during tax loss harvesting. If an ETF has declined in value and an investor sells it, the trade and cash proceeds will not settle for two business days (T+2). That investor may want to “replace” the sold ETF immediately and attempt to buy another ETF or mutual fund simultaneously.
However, mutual funds settle on T+1 basis, so cash for the mutual purchase would be due in one business day (which is one day earlier than the cash from the ETF sale is received). This can obviously cause problems and (even though this issue can be addressed with careful planning) I find it easier to keep accounts invested in similar vehicles. In this case, if a portfolio is all mutual funds, I might lean more towards SWPPX. If all ETFs, I might lean more towards IVV.
On this topic, investors may want to avoid using these two funds as tax loss harvesting substitutes for one another since they could be considered “substantially identical.”
SWPPX does not have a stated minimum for purchases, although some brokerages (especially competitors of Schwab) impose minimums. The minimum purchase size for IVV is typically one share, although fractional shares are becoming more common. Investors can trade ETFs intraday, as well as in the pre-market and after-hours trading sessions. Investors can only buy/sell mutual funds once per day. This is not necessarily a major factor for long-term investors however.
Final Thoughts: SWPPX vs IVV
Both SWPPX and IVV are large, core funds sponsored and managed by Schwab and Blackrock’s iShares respectively. Performance has been nearly identical. I view SWPPX and IVV as essentially interchangeable and would not spend too much energy trying to decide which one is “better.”
However, there are some situations that may call for one fund versus another. For instance, many custodians offer free ETF trades, but charge trading fees or redemption fees for mutual funds. So I might select SWPPX or IVV solely based on where my account is held or whether I’m investing taxable vs retirement dollars. Despite these considerations, these two funds are very similar for all intents and purposes.